Skip to main content

Table 3 Evaluation of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) effect on pain scores and narcotic consumption

From: Nanomedicine review: clinical developments in liposomal applications

References

Years

Surgery

n

Efficacy at POD 1

VAS score

NRS score

POTO (mg)

Yeung et al. (2018)

2018

Robotic sacrocolpopexy with posterior repair

33

28

27.2a

Mazloomdoost et al. (2017)

2017

Retropubic sling placement

54

8.25

2

13.56

Davidovitch et al. (2017)

2017

Operative fixation of ankle fracture

37

65

3.4

Johnson et al. (2017)

2017

Total hip arthroplasty

54

3.5

26.3

McGraw-Tatum et al. (2017)

2017

Total hip arthroplasty

40

107.5d

60.6

Sabesan et al. (2017)

2017

Shoulder arthroplasty

34

41b

2.6

78.6

Abildgaard et al. (2017)

2017

Shoulder arthroplasty

37

40.9a

103.11

Namdari et al. (2017)

2017

Shoulder arthroplasty

78

39e

14.4

Amundson et al. (2017)

2017

Total knee arthroplasty

52

3.7

45

DeClaire et al. (2017)

2017

Total knee arthroplasty

47

44.4b

97.7

Smith et al. (2017)

2017

Total knee arthroplasty

104

40c

10.9

Alijanipour et al. (2016)

2016

Total knee arthroplasty

59

26

71.20

Barron et al. (2016)

2016

Laparoscopic hysterectomy

32

2.79

360

  1. n number of patients, POD postoperative day, VAS visual analogue scale pain score in POD 3 (0–100 range, 0 = “no pain” and 100 = “worst pain”), NRS numerical rating scale pain score in POD 3 (0–10 range, 0 = “no pain” and 10 = “worst pain”), POTO postoperative total opiates consumption
  2. aMedian consumption of opiates for POD 1–3
  3. bAt POD 2
  4. cAverage on POD 0 through 3
  5. dObtained by integrating serial pain assessments over the entire time interval
  6. eAt POD 1