Skip to main content

Table 6 Toxicity of the clinical trials with doxorubicin

From: Nanomedicine review: clinical developments in liposomal applications

References

Disease

LF

Toxicity

Grade 3–5 (%)

Hematological

Non-hematological

N

T

L

A

F

Na

D

V

S/M

HFS

R

Banerjee et al. (2018)

ROC

PLD

4

   

6

 

2

6

6

  

Lee et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD

7

3

 

4

       

Monk et al. (2017)a

ROC

PLD

    

74.1

  

33.3

  

4.1

Marth et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD

15

  

4

5

5

5

6

6

12

2

Lindemann et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD

 

2

 

2

 

7

 

7

   

Herzog et al. (2016)

ROC

PLD

13

  

13

       

Runnebaum et al. (2018)

ROC

PLD + trebananib

18

10

15

  

5

 

5

   

Lee et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD + carboplatin

26

13

 

8

       

Sehouli et al. (2016)

ROC

PLD + carboplatin

27

15

17

10

2

     

2

Nagao et al. (2016)

ROC

PLD + paclitaxel + carboplatin

83

33

83

100

 

17

  

50

17

 

Landrum et al. (2016)

ROC

PLD + carboplatin + bevacizumab + veliparib

30

40

30

        

Kim et al. (2015)

ROC

PLD + carboplatin + farletuzumab

40

  

13

67

33

20

20

 

33

33

Monk et al. (2017)a

ROC

PLD + motolimod

    

87.8

  

50.3

  

10.9

Marth et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD + trebananib

8

  

4

7

6

3

6

7

20

2

Shoji et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD + irinotecan

55

3

32

10

3

3

3

10

   

Thaker et al. (2017)

ROC

PLD + GEN

71

 

57

28

    

28

  

Herzog et al. (2016)

ROC

PLD + vintafolide

17

 

5

     

5

  

Jehn et al. (2016)

MBC

Caelix®

   

4

     

12

 

Harbeck et al. (2016)

MBC

PLD

3

1

4

1

4

   

6

39

 

Chang et al. (2018)

MBC

PLD + cyclophosphamide

42

 

47

5

 

10

 

5

1

  

Tampaki et al. (2018)

BC

PLD + cyclophosphamide + bevacizumab + paclitaxel

24

1.6

   

6.5

 

1.6

9.7

  

Basho et al. (2016)

TNBC

PLD + bevacizumab + temsirolimus

8

4

  

4

   

8

13

 

PLD + bevacizumab + everolimus

22

11

 

22

22

   

11

  

Rocca et al. (2017)

BC

PLD + lapatinib

      

11

 

11

11

 

Coltelli et al. (2017)

BC

Myocet® + cyclophosphamide + PTX

25

    

6

4

6

   

Cohen et al. (2018)

MM

PLD + pomalidomide + dexamethasone

51

4

38

31

9

      

Orlowski et al. (2016)

RMM

PLD + bortezomib

           

Becker et al. (2016)

MM

PLD + bortezomib + cyclophosphamide + dexamethasone

10

  

5

  

5

 

5

10

 

Voorhees et al. (2017)

RMM

PLD + bortezomib + vorinostat

37

47

  

16

9

19

9

 

9

 

Luminari et al. (2017)

DLBCL

Myocet® + cyclophosphamide + vincristine + prednisone

64

8

 

46

 

2

     

Fridrik et al. (2016)

DLBCL

Myocet® + cyclophosphamide + vincristine + prednisone + rituximab

50

 

50

85

      

29

  1. In the blanks, this type of toxicity is not reported
  2. LF liposomal formulation, N neutropenia, T thrombocytopenia, L leukopenia, A anemia, F fatigue, Na nauseas, D diarrhea, V vomiting, S/M stomatitis/mucositis, HFS hand–foot syndrome, R rash, PLD PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin, GEN an IL-12 plasmid formulated with PEG–PEI–cholesterol lipopolymer, ROC recurrent ovarian cancer, MBC metastatic breast cancer, BC breast cancer, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, RMM relapse or refractory multiple myeloma, MM multiple myeloma, DLBCL relapse or refractory multiple myeloma
  3. aAny serious adverse event = 3.4 and 8.2% in PLD and PLD + motolimod injections, respectively